Although Selenium and Puppeteer practically serve the same function, they are fundamentally different. They both support automation testing, and the two approaches are fundamentally different. For software testers and developers, it is critical first to identify the right tool for their particular needs, whether they are long-term or project-based. You can’t afford to make costly errors because automated UI testing is critical to your software delivery pipeline. This kind of UI testing is inherently tricky. Fortunately, there are browser testing frameworks to simplify the process. To assist you in selecting the ideal tool for your testing requirements, they will describe these libraries and their essential components in this Puppeteer tutorial.
Support structures:
Selenium aims to support a wide range of browsers as a testing library. Puppeteer is a Chrome remote control library, whereas Selenium is a web-UI testing library. Knowing which percentage of your user’s uses specific browsers is essential if you are concerned that problems with a particular browser will affect your website. When contrasting Selenium with Puppeteer, it is crucial to comprehend how the library’s support will affect your user’s experience.
Programming language Support:
Selenium training and placement in USA is a testing library that is concentrated on offering comprehensive coverage for a variety of programming languages. Support for Ruby, C#, Java, Python, and JavaScript is officially listed for Selenium. Most of your staff probably already have some knowledge of more than one of those languages. On the other hand, Puppeteer is not concerned with offering a varied experience for various developers. Instead, it focuses on providing a particular set of control structures in a targeted manner as a browser control tool. The only programming language that Puppeteer focuses on won’t likely be a deal-breaker.
Ease of use:
Selenium is a testing library, and Selenium Certification provides that you have completed the courses and entails methodically creating precise scenarios. It is used to confirm that your product performed as you had anticipated. On the other hand, Puppeteer excels in this situation. It is significantly simpler to automate the creation of Puppeteer programming because it is singularly focused and uses a single API. Teams will reduce setup time for automated browser tests by 60–70% by utilizing that test recorder for Puppeteer.
Which is better?
Selenium and Puppeteer are two different tools with marginally distinct functions. You will probably discover Puppeteer is the better tool for the job if your needs are compatible. On the other hand, you already know that Puppeteer won’t work for what you want if you need to support browsers other than Chrome and you need language bindings that aren’t in JavaScript. Selenium is a tried-and-true technology that developers use all across the world. Any project you choose will have a great library to help you on your way to using automated tests to deliver better, safer, and more secure code.
Bottom Line:
Your needs ultimately determine whether to use Puppeteer or Selenium. Selenium is a preferable option if testing browser apps is your main priority. Puppeteer is a better fit if Chrome and JavaScript are your only priorities. Additionally, Selenium supports various programming languages and enables the creation of more secure code for automated testing. Both are fantastic and can enhance your experience with automated tests.