Although Selenium and Puppeteer practically serve the same function, they are fundamentally different. They both support automation testing, and the two approaches are fundamentally different. For software testers and developers, it is critical first to identify the right tool for their particular needs, whether they are long-term or project-based. You can’t afford to make costly errors because automated UI testing is critical to your software delivery pipeline. This kind of UI testing is inherently tricky. Fortunately, there are browser testing frameworks to simplify the process. To assist you in selecting the ideal tool for your testing requirements, they will describe these libraries and their essential components in this Puppeteer tutorial.
Selenium aims to support a wide range of browsers as a testing library. Puppeteer is a Chrome remote control library, whereas Selenium is a web-UI testing library. Knowing which percentage of your user’s uses specific browsers is essential if you are concerned that problems with a particular browser will affect your website. When contrasting Selenium with Puppeteer, it is crucial to comprehend how the library’s support will affect your user’s experience.
Programming language Support:
Ease of use:
Selenium is a testing library, and Selenium Certification provides that you have completed the courses and entails methodically creating precise scenarios. It is used to confirm that your product performed as you had anticipated. On the other hand, Puppeteer excels in this situation. It is significantly simpler to automate the creation of Puppeteer programming because it is singularly focused and uses a single API. Teams will reduce setup time for automated browser tests by 60–70% by utilizing that test recorder for Puppeteer.
Which is better?